REVISITING THE EFFECT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND GCG ON SUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCE: STRATEGIC POSTURE AS A MODERATING VARIABLE
AbstractPurpose — There are problems that arise and are interesting to analyze the impact of organizational culture, corporate governance on sustainability performance with strategic posture as moderating variable. Design/methodology/approach — For this analysis, the population is all companies listed for Indonesia Stock Exchange Technique sampling in this research is purposive sampling. The data were collected from www.idx.co.id and other relevant sources comprising the company's website for the 2009-2018 period. The data were collected and the technical analysis used is Warp PLS programs. Findings — Based on the analysis and discussion, the results showed that there is a significant effect of organizational culture on sustainability performance, also there is a significant effect of corporate governance on sustainability performance. Practical implications — Strategic posture can be moderating variable in the relationship between organizational culture and corporate governance on sustainability performance. Originality/value — The awareness about the disclosure of sustainability in Indonesia is still low. Furthermore, environmental, societal, cultural, and governance issues are considered essential and integral aspects of company performance. Keywords — Organizational Culture, Corporate Governance, Strategic Posture, Sustainability Performance
Abdulrahim, M. O., Sukoharsono, E. G., Saraswati, E., & Subekti, I. (2020). The Mediating Effect of Strategic Posture on The Link Between Organizational Culture And Sustainability Performance.
Abeysekera, I. (2010). The influence of board size on intellectual capital disclosure by Kenyan listed firms. Journal of intellectual capital.
Abor, J. (2007). Corporate governance and financing decisions of Ghanaian listed firms. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society.
Abu-Jarad, I. Y., Yusof, N. a., & Nikbin, D. (2010). A review paper on organizational culture and organizational performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(3).
Allegrini, M., & Greco, G. (2013). Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(1), 187-216.
Alvesson, M., & Lindkvist, L. (1993). Transaction Costs, Clans and Corporate Culture. Journal of management studies, 30(3), 428-453.
AragÃ³nâ€SÃ¡nchez, A., & SÃ¡nchezâ€MarÃn, G. (2005). Strategic orientation, management characteristics, and performance: A study of Spanish SMEs. Journal of small business management, 43(3), 287-308.
Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (2008). Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision, 46(3), 433-448.
Azhar, S. M. (2008). Strategic orientation and performance: The case of equifinality from a developing market perspective. The Business Review, Cambridge, 10(2), 120-128.
Baird, K., Harrison, G., & Reeve, R. (2007). The culture of Australian organizations and its relation with strategy. International Journal of Business Studies: A Publication of the Faculty of Business Administration, Edith Cowan University, 15(1), 15.
Baysinger, B. D., Kosnik, R. D., & Turk, T. A. (1991). Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 205-214.
Benn, S., Edwards, M., & Williams, T. (2018). Organizational change for corporate sustainability: Routledge.
BerglÃ¶f, E., & Pajuste, A. (2005). What do firms disclose and why? Enforcing corporate governance and transparency in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2), 178-197.
Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2007). Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 393-403.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. (1999). E.(1999). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework: John Wiley & Sons.
Carmeli, A. (2005). Perceived external prestige, affective commitment, and citizenship behaviors. Organization studies, 26(3), 443-464.
Chatman, J. A., & Spataro, S. E. (2005). Using self-categorization theory to understand relational demographyâ€“based variations in people's responsiveness to organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2), 321-331.
Chen, G., Firth, M., Gao, D. N., & Rui, O. M. (2006). Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of corporate finance, 12(3), 424-448.
Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., RodrÃguez-Ariza, L., & GarcÃa-SÃ¡nchez, I.-M. (2015). The role of independent directors at family firms in relation to corporate social responsibility disclosures. International Business Review, 24(5), 890-901.
Cullen, L., & Christopher, T. (2002). GOVERNANCE DISCLOSURES AND FIRM CHARACTERISTICS OF LISTED AUSTRALIAN MINING COMPANIES. International Journal of Business Studies, 10(1).
Delmas, M., & Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Business strategy and the environment, 13(4), 209-222.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).