The Effect of Accountability, Public Trust, Reputation and Perceived Quality of Zakat Institution to Muzzaki’s Behavior

Authors

  • Raudhah Trisna Wardhani Brawijaya University
  • Zaki Baridwan Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Brawijaya University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21776/ijabs.2023.31.3.698

Keywords:

Accountability, Public Trust, Institution's Reputation, Perceived Quality, Muzzaki’s behavior

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to examine the effects of accountability, public trust, reputation, and the perceived quality of the institution on Muzzaki’s behavior.

Design/methodology/approach This study used an associative causality approach with data collection techniques using questionnaires. The population of this study were all muzzaki at the Zakat Management Organization in East Java, totaling 10,000 muzzaki. The sampling method used in this research was purposive sampling. The analysis technique used was a variance-based structural equation model (SEM) or component-based SEM, known as Partial Least Square (PLS).

FindingsInstitutional accountability had a positive effect on public trust, the institution's reputation, perceived quality, and Muzzaki’s behavior. Public trust had a positive effect on Muzzaki’s behavior, and the institution's reputation and perceived quality had a positive effect on Muzzaki's behavior.

Practical implications The results showed that the implementation of institutional accountability is an important factor in increasing public trust, institutional reputation, perceived quality, and muzzaki’s behavior, so the Amil Zakat Institution in East Java Province is expected to be able to implement accountability properly so that the level of public trust, institutional reputation and perceived quality will be increase, so does the behavior of muzzaki at the Amil Zakat Institution in East Java Province.

Originality/value This research replicates and modifies the concept of previous research where there was a gap between the similar variables studied, which obtained inconsistent results.

References

Amulidina, I.H. 2020. Pengaruh Sikap, Subjective Norm, Perceived Control, Trust dan Religiusitas terhadap Minat Membayar Zakat Masyarakat Lumajang pada Badan Amil Zakat Nasional. Naskah Publikasi. Universitas Islam Negeeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim

Becker, A. 2018. An Experimental Study of Voluntary Nonprofit Accountability and Effects on Public Trust, Reputation, Perceived Quality, and Donation Behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(3), 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018756200

Fang, L., Lu, Z., and Dong, L. 2021. Differentiating service quality impact between the online and off-line context: an empirical investigation of a corporate travel agency. International Hospitality Review, 35(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/ihr-01-2020-0003

Fatimah, R. 2019. Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Dana Desa (Dd) Terhadap Kepercayaan Masyarakat Di Desa Pammusureng. Tesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.

Hermansyah, I., Rahman, R., and Suherman, M. 2018. Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Dan Transparansi Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Publik (Survei Pada Dinas Daerah Kotatasikmalaya). Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(1), 21–29.

Hikmaningsih, H., and Pramuka, B. A. 2020. Akuntabilitas Pada Lembaga Amil Zakat Infak Dan Sedekah Dalam Perspektif Shari’Ah Enterprise Theory (Set). Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi, 22(3), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.32424/jeba.v22i3.1644

Ikhwandha, M. F. 2018. Pengaruh Transparansi, Akuntabilitas, Kepercayaan Efektif dan Kognitif Terhadap Minat Bayar Zakat Melalui Lembaga Zakat. Skripsi.

Londa, V. Y. 2018. Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Kerja Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Pada Pt. Pos Indonesia (Persero) Manado. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 4(52).

Muawanah, R. 2019. Pengaruh Kepercayaan dan Citra Lembaga Terhadap Minat Muzzaki Membayar Zis (Zakat, Infaq dan Shadaqah) di Lembaga Amil Zakat Ummul Quro (Laz-Uq) Jombang. BIMA : Journal of Business and Innovation Management, 1(2), 111-127

Nugraha, E. 2019. Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Transparansi Dan Kualitas Pelayanan Lembaga Pengelola Zakatterhadap Komitmen Muzakki: Kepercayaan Muzakkisebagai Variabel Intervening. Akuntabilitas, 13(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.29259/ja.v13i2.9592

Nurhasanah, S. 2018. Akuntabilitas Laporan Keuangan Lembaga Amil Zakat Dalam Memaksimalkan Potensi Zakat. Akuntabilitas, 11(2), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.15408/akt.v11i2.8826

Pertiwi, D. E., and Husaini. 2017. Ukuran Komite Komite Audit Dan Penerapan Manajemen Risiko. Jurnal Fairness, 7(3), 169–180.

Pires, V., and Trez, G. 2018. Corporate reputation: A discussion on construct definition and measurement and its relation to performance. Revista de Gestao, 25(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-11-2017-005

Ridho, W.A.N, and Violita, E. 2020. Do Muslim Donors Consider Accountability, Trust, and Reputation? https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.1-11-2019.2294023

Salamah, S. U. 2017. Relasi Zakat dan Pajak: Studi Kasus Badan Amil Zakat Nasional Kabupaten Malang dan Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Kepanjen Malang. Jurisdictie, 6(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v6i1.4087

Setyowati, E. 2021. Pengaruh Akuntabilitas, Transparansi dan Kualitas Layanan terhadap Tingkat Kepercayaan Muzakki di LAZISMU Kota dan Kabupaten Magelang. Tesis. Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang.

Syaima, N.N. 2017. Pengaruh Merek, Reputasi, Kualitas Pelayanan dan Lokasi Terhadap Proses Keputusan Nasabah Menggunakan Produk Tabungan di BJB Syariah KCP. Ciputat. Naskah Publikasi. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Walidah, Z. N., and Anah, L. 2020. Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Lembaga dan Transparansi Laporan Keuangan Terhadap Kepercayaan Muzzaki Lembaga Amil Zakat Ummur Quro (Laz- Uq) Jombang. JFAS : Journal of Finance and Accounting Studies, 2(2), 90–104. https://ejournal.feunhasy.ac.id/jfas/article/view/189

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29

How to Cite

Raudhah Trisna Wardhani, & Zaki Baridwan. (2023). The Effect of Accountability, Public Trust, Reputation and Perceived Quality of Zakat Institution to Muzzaki’s Behavior. The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society, 31(3), 308–317. https://doi.org/10.21776/ijabs.2023.31.3.698