REGULATION HEGEMONY AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT: A STUDY ON REGIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA
AbstractAbstractObjectives - The purpose of this study is to uncover the reality of implementing regional financial management regulations and their impact on local government accountability.Research method approach - This study uses a critical qualitative research approach to the Gramsci hegemony perspective. This approach is useful for analyzing the shackles of regulation in the implementation of regional financial management.Findings - The results show that regulation has become a means for the state to dominate in the realm of political society and hegemony for civil society. This results in an orientation of local government accountability which tends to vertical accountability rather than horizontal (public) accountability .Practical implications -Â Changes in regional autonomy regulations have led to increasing dominance of the central government to the regions. This is reflected in the various regulations produced by the institutions in the central government which shackle the space and innovation of the local government in managing regional finances.Social implications - Due to the shackles of the regulation, local governments prioritize serving the interests of the central government (vertical accountability) compared to services to the society (horizontal accountability).Originality / Value - This study contributes to uncovering the facts that occur related to regional financial management, so that it can provide input to the government in the implementation of regional government accountability.Keywords: Regional Government Accountability, Regional Financial Management Regulations, Regulation Hegemony.Paper Type: Research Paper
Adhikari, P., & GÃ¥rseth-Nesbakk, L. (2016). Implementing public sector accruals in OECD member states: Major issues and challenges. Accounting Forum , 40 (2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.02.001
Ahmed, Z., Hopper, T., & Wickramsinghe, D. (2010). Hegemony, Counter Hegemony and NGO Accountability Change: BRAC in Bangladesh. In The Sixth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting (APIRA) (pp. 1â€“39). Sidney. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Angelis, M. De, Carroll, T., Li, TM, & Fine, B. (2016). The Neoliberal Disaster: Dismantling Social Development Projects as Neoliberal Trojan Horses . (M. Habibi, Ed.). Malang: Intrans Publising.
Arnaboldi, M., Lapsley, I., & Steccolini, I. (2015). Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge. Financial Accountability and Management , 31 (1). https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12049
Bovens, M. (2006). Analysis and Assessment of Public Accountability. A Conceptual Framework. Retrieved from http://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/
Bovens, M. (2007). Analyzing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal , 13 (4), 447â€“468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
Cameron, W. (2004). Public accountability: Effectiveness, equity, ethics. Australian Journal of Public Administration , 63 (4), 59â€“67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2004.00402.x
Carter, D., & Molisa, P. (2005). Accounting Harmony, Neo Gramscian Disharmony: A New Zealand Perspective (2005 No. 37). Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.accounting-research.org.nz
Christensen, M. (2002). Accrual accounting in the public sector: The case of the New South Wales government . Accounting History (Vol. 7). https://doi.org/10.1177/103237320200700205
Christensen, T., & LÃ¦greid, P. (2001). New public management: The effects of contractualism and devolution on political control. Public Management Review , 3 (1), 73â€“94. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616670010009469
Christensen, T., & LÃ¦greid, P. (2014). Performance and Accountability â€” A Theoretical Discussion and an Empirical Assessment. Public Organization Review , 15 (2), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0267-2
Connolly, C., & Hyndman, N. (2006). The actual implementation of accruals accounting: Caveats from a case within the UK public sector. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal , 19 (2), 272â€“290. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610656123
Cooper, C. (1995). Ideology, Hegemony and Accounting Discourse: A Case Study of the National Union of Journalists. Critical Perspective on Accounting , 6 , 175â€“209.
Creswell, JW (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches . Sage Publicantions, Thousand Oaks, California (Vol. 2nd ed). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aenj.2008.02.005
Denhardt, JV, & Denhardt, RB (2007). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering . ME Sharpe . New York: ME Sharpe, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1081/e-epap3-120024737
Djamhuri, A. (2009). a Case Study of Governmental Accounting . Universiti Sains Malaysia.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 The International Journal of Accounting and Business Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).